Donald Trump says he has fired a top election official who contradicted the US president’s claims of voter fraud.
President Trump said he “terminated” Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (Cisa) chief Chris Krebs for his “highly inaccurate” remarks on vote integrity.
Mr Trump has refused to concede the US election, making unsubstantiated claims of “massive” voter fraud.
Election officials said the vote was the “most secure” in US history.
Last week the president fired Department of Defense Secretary Mark Esper, amid reports that he doubted the Pentagon chief’s loyalty.
There is speculation in Washington DC that before Mr Trump leaves office in January, CIA director Gina Haspel and FBI director Christopher Wray could also be for the chopping block.
Like many others fired by Mr Trump, Mr Krebs only learned he was out of a job when he saw the president’s tweet on Tuesday, a person close to him told Reuters news agency.
He had run the agency from its inception two years ago in the aftermath of alleged Russian meddling in the 2016 election.
To guard against potential cyber-threats, Cisa works with state and local election officials and the private companies that supply voting systems, while monitoring ballot tabulation and the power grid.
Why was Krebs fired?
He had reportedly incurred the White House’s displeasure over a Cisa website called Rumor Control, which debunked election misinformation, much of it amplified by the president himself.
Reuters reports that the White House was particularly unhappy with a Krebs post that had debunked a conspiracy theory about an intelligence agency supercomputer named Hammer and Scorecard supposedly tampering with the national vote count.
Mr Krebs and other former US officials have said that no such system exists.
Shortly before he was fired, he posted a tweet that appeared to take aim at Mr Trump’s allegation that voting machines in various states had switched ballots to his rival Joe Biden.
Mr Krebs tweeted: “ICYMI: On allegations that election systems were manipulated, 59 election security experts all agree, ‘in every case of which we are aware, these claims either have been unsubstantiated or are technically incoherent.’ #Protect2020”.
He was among senior officials from the Department of Homeland Security who last week declared the 3 November US general election the “most secure in American history”, while rejecting “unfounded claims”.
Though that statement did not name Mr Trump, on the same day it was published Mr Krebs retweeted a Twitter post by an election law expert saying: “Please don’t retweet wild and baseless claims about voting machines, even if they’re made by the president.”
Krebs pays for his candour with his job
As Cisa director, Mr Krebs’ voice carried weight.
His analysis of accusations of mass voter fraud is simple to summarise: there is no evidence of mass voter fraud.
He knew his words would displease President Trump. Last Thursday he told associates he expected to be fired, and he was right.
He was put in an impossible position. Mr Trump said that his statements were inaccurate because of “massive improprieties and fraud” during the election.
But Mr Krebs’ didn’t find that.
Perhaps the president will produce a trove of material backing his statements up, but as yet he hasn’t found evidence of this either.
Mr Krebs was therefore put in a position no one wants to be in – appease Donald Trump and say what he wants to hear – or risk his career by saying things his master would take umbrage to.
He chose the latter, and paid for it with his job.
What’s the reaction?
The Republican president’s dismissal of Mr Krebs provoked condemnation from the Democratic-controlled House of Representatives Committee on Homeland Security.
Its leaders said Mr Trump’s decision “makes America less safe” and would not help defend the country from “malicious cyber campaigns from Russia, China and Iran”.
“The fact is that, since Election Day, President Trump has sought to de-legitimise the election results by engaging in a disinformation campaign that could shatter public confidence in our elections for generations,” said the committee members.
The Democratic chairman of the House intelligence committee, Adam Schiff, said: “It’s pathetic, but sadly predictable that upholding and protecting our democratic processes would be cause for firing.”