Trump Twitter ban ‘raises regulation questions’ – Hancock

Bans imposed by Twitter, Facebook and Instagram on Donald Trump’s accounts raise a “big question” about how social media is regulated, Matt Hancock says.

The companies acted after supporters of the US president stormed Washington DC’s Capitol building on Wednesday.

The health secretary said the bans showed they were now “taking editorial decisions”.

Campaigners want social media to be treated as “publishers”, rather than “platforms”, meaning more regulation.

But opponents of the idea argue that it could allow governments to limit debate.

Mr Trump faces an impeachment charge, with Democrats accusing the Republican president of encouraging the Washington riots, in which five people died.

Twitter permanently suspended his @realDonaldTrump account on Saturday, citing the “risk of further incitement of violence”.

But Mr Trump called this an attack on free speech and suggested he would look at “building out our own platform in the future”.

Choosing voices’

There has been a long-running debate over whether social media companies should be treated in law as “publishers”, with greater responsibility for dealing with libellous, discriminatory, misleading or incendiary content posted by users.

Mr Hancock, a former culture secretary, told BBC One’s Andrew Marr Show: “The scenes, clearly encouraged by President Trump – the scenes at the Capitol – were terrible – and I was very sad to see that because American democracy is such a proud thing.

“But there’s something else that has changed, which is that social media platforms are making editorial decisions now. That’s clear because they’re choosing who should and shouldn’t have a voice on their platform.”

Mr Hancock said that development was likely to have “consequences”.

Trump image

Asked earlier about Twitter’s decision to ban Mr Trump’s account, he told Sky News: “I think it raises a very important question, which is it means that the social media platforms are taking editorial decisions.

“And that is a very big question because then it raises questions about their editorial judgements and the way that they’re regulated.”

Twitter’s ban on Mr Trump’s account followed the increasing use of warning labels on his posts referring to the coronavirus pandemic and the result of the US presidential election.

In a blog on Friday, the company said its public interest framework existed “to enable the public to hear from elected officials and world leaders directly”.

It added: “However, we made it clear going back years that these accounts are not above our rules and cannot use Twitter to incite violence. We will continue to be transparent around our policies and their enforcement.”

Facebook and Instagram banned Mr Trump “indefinitely” on Thursday, with Facebook chief executive Mark Zuckerberg saying this sanction would not be lifted until at least 20 January, when Joe Biden is sworn in as the new US president.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.